Initial Campaign 0

This is the start of a working Campaign 0 writeup.  It has a .pdf which
I think is ccurrent.
This commit is contained in:
Jigme Datse Yli-Rasku 2024-01-21 15:11:37 -08:00
parent 3bd0cfb3a1
commit 24331da360
8 changed files with 386 additions and 0 deletions

39
campaign-0/000-header.tex Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
\documentclass[twoside,10pt,openany]{book}
\usepackage{geometry}
\usepackage{titling}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{tocloft}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\setlist{noitemsep}
\usepackage[obeyFinal,shadow,tickmarkheight=12pt,prependcaption]{todonotes}
\setlength{\marginparwidth}{2cm}
\usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{mybiblio.bib}
\geometry{papersize={5.5in,8.5in}} % Half Letter
%\geometry{a5paper} % A5 Paper
\begin{document}
\title{Campaign 0 --- Before You Start}
\date{2024 January 16 to \today}
\author{Jigme Datse Yli-Rasku}
\def\address{Address:\\
Jigme Datse\\
PO Box 270\\
Rossland, BC V0G 1Y0\\
Canada\\
\\
jigme.datse@datsemultimedia.com}
\postdate{\par\end{center}\vfill \address}
\maketitle
\tableofcontents

30
campaign-0/900-footer.tex Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
\appendix
\chapter{Appendix}
Here, maybe having an appendix, with each of the other things as
sections? Let's see.
\section{Bibliography}
\printbibliography[title={References}]
% Enable if used:
% Figures
% Tables
%\section{List of Figures}
%\listoffigures
%\section{List of Tables}
%\listoftables
\section{Todo Items}
This is here (the appendix), so it will show up in the table of contents.
Without some text here, it sadly is currently putting a totally empty
page, then the list of todo items. Not ideal. That is a\todo{Todo
item}, I would say.
\listoftodos\todo{Figure out how to get the todo checkbox/colour to be here.}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
\chapter{Book Development History}
This will include some idea of how this book has progressed along time
each section will cover that day's work...
\section{2024 January 16}
Created the document, and started with setting up the basic formatting.
Started writing about ``Why Session 0?''
Currently taking a break (any further writing will have to be
tomorrow (or later) if I take more than a very brief break), part
way through writing about `Familiarity With Players'.
\end{document}

BIN
campaign-0/Campaign-0.pdf Normal file

Binary file not shown.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
\input{000-header}
\include{introduction}
\include{why}
\input{900-footer}
\input{901-history}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
\chapter{Introduction}
This is a gaming resource, largely focused on table top roleplaying games
or TTRPGs. It's mostly about the `before you start playing' portion of
playing these games, which for some may be part of the `one session' in
a one shot type game, or it may be an entirely separate session.
I am writing this as I'm reading {\it Avatar Legends}\cite{avatar-legends}
and wanting to start a campaign/session up to play that, as a nice
accessible and family friendly game.
I have heard actual play of the game.
So, here's a bit of a discription of what I want to talk about here.
\begin{itemize}
\item{Why Sesion 0}
\item{Introducing Game}
\item{Game Master's Perspective}
\item{Players Perspective}
\item{Safety Tools}
\begin{itemize}
\item{Lines and Veils}
\item{X Card}
\item{Consent in Gaming}
\item{TTRPG Safety Toolkit}
\item{Open Door}
\item{Post Session Debrief}
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
Most of this is coming from other sources, but right now, I've not got an
easy way to include those (I've got the tools, just not set them up), and
the whole book is more my perspective, as coloured by those resources.
\section{Chapter Sumaries}
This will include the sumaries of the chapters that we have as we go along.
They will be one or two short paragraphs, just so you can quickly be able
to see where you might want to go with a given topic.
\subsection{Introduction}
This is what you're reading. It hopefully at least the main parts of this
will be kept short enough that you can read and get a fair sense of what the
overall intent of this book is. Great, `pick up at the store, read to see
if you want to pick up a copy,' type thing.
\section{Other Versions}
This will have a list of known released to the wild other versions. As
this is currently being developed on my Forgejo server\todo{Figure out how
to link properly to that version}, versions may be released that we are
not aware of.
It will inlcude the current version information on release, and the
previous version info. This is intended to be a living document, so if
you are finding a version which is on the older side, there may be more
recent versions available.

34
campaign-0/mybiblio.bib Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
@periodical{brokenp2023-f,
title = {Broken Pencil},
publisher = {Hal Niedzviecki},
number = {100},
year = {2023}
}
@article{bp-amerdream,
journal = {Broken Pencil},
title = {Zines --- {America's Dreaming Zine \#11}},
publisher = {Hal Niedzviecki},
number = {100},
year = {2023},
author = {Devin Canary},
pages = {29}
}
@book{avatar-legends,
title = {Avatar Legends},
author = {Sharing Biswas and others},
year = {2022},
editor = {Monte Lin and Kate Unaru},
subtitle = {The Roleplaying Game},
language = {English},
publisher = {Viacom International Inc.},
pagetotal = {305}
}
@book{querent,
title = {Querent},
subtitle = {The Cartomancer's Tome},
year = {2019},
author = {Adrian Taul and Amela Nuhodzic and Jaymee Fulcher and Kayla Miskiv and Maggie DeCapua and McKenzie ``Mish'' Shea and Sage Burns},
Language = {English},
Publisher = {Magpie Games},
pagetotal = {439}
}

200
campaign-0/why.tex Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
\chapter{Why Session 0?}
Some of what I have to say falls into the `controversial' category, and
the why of a Session 0 at least in part falls into that category.
By controversial, it is more that there are some people who are opposed
to at least some of the functions that come up here (and possibly all of
the functions for probably an even smaller minority). Most players are
either supportive, or unaware of some of this.
\begin{itemize}
\item{Familiarity with game}
\item{Setting up game}
\item{Familiarity with players}
\item{Safety Tools}
\item{When have it}
\item{Time it takes}
\item{Where to have it}
\end{itemize}
That's probably a decent list of the main reasons, and let's get into
each of them.
\section{Familiarity with game}
This may be the least contested part of what a Session 0 can accomplish.
This is ensuring that to some extent all the players involved are
familiar enough with the game, that there will not be major issues
with failing to understand some of the basics.
Basics such as:
\begin{itemize}
\item{Core gameplay}
\item{Core setting}
\item{Core characters}
\item{Core themes}
\end{itemize}
These really are not in any sort of order, because they kind of move
about as to how one would want to talk about them.
\subsection{Core Gameplay}
This is the basics of the game mechanics. This can apply to stuff like
board games or whatever.
This is something that can take a very brief time, or it can be something
that will require some explanation.
I would think that some of the ways all of this happens ends up being
able to happen in a more woven between different parts of the Session
0 time (and also included in further sessions), or a very laid out
format.
Some of what comes up probably depends at least somewhat on what
the game is. Some games are intended to be played with minimal
pre-knowledge, and simply getting into it, while others really work
well with more of that.
Also the people involved (players, game master, et cetera) will change
how this will work out.
It is hoped that the game master will know at least a little of who they
are dealing with prior to setting up any meeting, or at least have the
ability to adapt enough that it ends up working out for most of the other
players.
Getting bogged down in the how to play the game, can very much end up
very quickly ruining the experience of a game. This is not to say that
the learning of the game has to happen before starting to play, but more
that to know basics (and for me some of these basics are about how
questions about how to play will likely be handled), so little things
don't get in the way of playing a game.
Some people really want to be sure that the rules are followed properly,
other people are very much on the other end of the spectrum, and don't
much care about the rules. Then there are people who are all for the
chaos, switching between caring about the rules, and ignoring the rules,
as they see fit.
Finding that sort of thing out before trying to play can be a huge
measure of how the game is likely to end up working.
\subsection{Core Setting}
This can be very simple, and for some games it is defined very simply.
In a lot of cases, you probably don't want to go more into it than a
basic understanding of what the characters are likely to all know
about the world, and for some that may be at the `village level'.
That being that at the start of the game, they basically know nothing
beyond much of their immediate surroundings, and in some cases may
wake up not really knowing anything.
That said, it may be worthwhile to have the players know more than
the characters.
\subsection{Core Characters}
This is more about the types of characters the players will be playing
and encountering than any details about any of that (though some of the
details will come up in the setting up of the game).
This is sort of similar to the above about the setting, it would be
about making sure the players are aware enough about what the characters
are likely aware of.
\subsection{Core Themes}
This can be the start of where things start to be more of a discussion
than simply describing the way the game is setup. The game master will
likely have some degree of where they want to take things, but most are
usually willing to move that around in response to what the players are
interested in.
Most games have some sense of defined themes that they are wanting to
deal with. Some despite maybe being more open at the core, will have
some rules like, `No Fascists Allowed,' which largely speaks for itself,
but there has been significant discussion, as it seems it doesn't seem
clear enough to some people.
Then there are the players. They have similar ideas as to what type
of game they may want to play, and what type of game they don't want
to play.
This part isn't about really going into the details of that, as some
of that ends up going into the safety tools section, but all of this
ends up interacting with everything, so this is probably going somewhat
into that.
With that all said, I think that is the basics of dealing with the
familiarity of the game.
Let's move on to setting up the game.
\section{Setting up the Game}
This is sometimes the most important part, with the creation of
characters, and the start of looking at where the game will start.
Now for some games such as {\it Querent}\cite{querent}, are meant to have
``No Session 0.'' Which I personally would put more in a, ``Session 0
and Session 1 are the same time,'' as it more means that the goals of
Session 0, can be accomplished quickly enough to not be separated from
the main session.
Important things about this, is setting things like the starting location
and the different characters that the players will be playing. Some of
which may not need to be discussed in terms of in person (or more
``realtime'' with how online games can be), but through email or
whatever.
This can be important to start to get a feel for the dynamics of the
group, to be able to see where potential pain points may come up.
The details about this will change for each game or game system you
are working with, and as I have worked with some games where it can
more or less run with little more than a brief (like a couple minutes
at most), introduction before playing, to games that I have spent hours
myself trying to prepare enough to present to players in advance, I feel
that talking further would be very individual to the different games.
\section{Familiarity with Players}
This applies to all the sort of interactions between all of the different
players, and to some extent the characters. This may be where one
starts to talk about personal and group boundaries.
This is getting into the territory where some people start to say, ``We
don't need that sort of thing.'' Some people are saying that from a
perspective of ``We are all friends, so we don't really need to do that
sort of thing.'' Other people are less charitable in their criticism,
and consider that it is an outright bad idea.
I would like to suggest a couple of reasons for those who feel that
they are all friends, so it's not needed, and also for those who
feel it's just a bad idea, but might not be stuck in that idea.
\begin{itemize}
\item{We Don't Need It}
\begin{itemize}
\item{Hidden Boundaries}
\item{Hidden Interests}
\end{itemize}
\item{This is a Bad Idea}
\begin{itemize}
\item{Then don't do it}
\item{Let your players know}
\item{Direct players to other places}
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\subsection{We Don't Need It}
So, if you are friends who have run around these types of things you
can think there's not really any reason to consider these things
but I kind of think there are a couple of pretty important things
to think about in terms of that.